top of page

Ontario government's Greenbelt land swap influenced by well-connected developers, AG finds

ONTARIO —An unsettling revelation has emerged from the auditor general's report, shedding light on the Ontario government's Greenbelt land selection process and its disturbing alignment with the interests of well-connected developers [1][2][3]. The report points fingers at Housing Minister Steve Clark's chief of staff, revealing a pervasive pattern of influence from developer circles that has cast doubts on the integrity of the process.

The Greenbelt, a region originally designated for environmental protection, has come under scrutiny as developers' interests seemed to intertwine with government decisions. The audit highlighted the pivotal role played by the chief of staff, who not only considered suggestions from developers but also acted upon them, demonstrating a worrisome level of influence in shaping land removal decisions [1][2][3].

However, the process was anything but transparent. The audit uncovered a lack of comprehensive environmental and financial assessments, which excluded input from experts, the public, and Indigenous communities. The absence of a holistic evaluation raised concerns about the potential degradation of protected lands. Such exclusions not only thwarted a thorough decision-making process but also risked the alienation of these critical stakeholders from a matter of public significance [1][2][3].

This revelation has triggered a wave of reactions. Opposition parties have called for the resignation of Housing Minister Steve Clark, demanding accountability for the questionable actions carried out under his watch. In response to the report's findings, Premier Doug Ford promised to take action, signaling his willingness to address the concerns raised by the auditor general's report. The government's commitment to implementing most of the recommendations offers a glimmer of hope for rectifying the tainted land selection process [1][2][3].

The impacts of this developer-driven land removal are far-reaching. The valuation of the removed land could rise by a staggering $8.3 billion, emphasizing the scale of the decisions influenced by well-connected parties. The removal process has raised concerns about the integrity of the Greenbelt's purpose, with woodland, wetland, and prime agricultural lands suffering consequences due to the limited oversight and hasty decision-making [1][2][3].

Premier Ford's emphasis on increasing housing supply to address affordability challenges and Housing Minister Clark's commitment to implementing recommendations swiftly suggests that the government recognizes the gravity of the situation and the need for a course correction. As the province grapples with the consequences of developer influence on vital land allocation decisions, the actions taken in response to the auditor general's report will play a pivotal role in restoring public trust and ensuring the Greenbelt's preservation for generations to come.



1 view


  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
Email Support Photos_Square.png
bottom of page