BC Updates Building Code To Allow Single Egress Designs For Mid-Rise Buildings

In a significant update, British Columbia (BC) has revised its building code to permit single egress designs in mid-rise buildings. This change is expected to streamline the construction process and reduce costs for developers. Previously, the code required at least two separate exits in buildings taller than three stories, which often resulted in higher construction costs and more complex designs. By allowing single egress designs, the province aims to support more efficient construction practices while maintaining safety standards.

The decision to update the building code comes after careful consideration of safety concerns and advancements in building technology. BC's Ministry of Housing and the BC Building and Safety Standards Branch conducted extensive research, concluding that single egress designs can be just as safe as multiple egress designs when certain safety measures are in place. These measures include enhanced fire protection systems, improved alarm and sprinkler systems, and specific design requirements that ensure residents can safely evacuate in an emergency.

This update is part of BC's broader strategy to address housing affordability and supply challenges. By reducing construction costs, developers may be more inclined to build mid-rise buildings, which are often seen as a sweet spot for urban development. Mid-rise buildings can offer a higher density of housing units while fitting more comfortably into existing neighborhoods compared to high-rise towers. The new code aims to encourage more of these types of buildings, potentially increasing the housing supply in areas where land is limited.

However, the change has sparked some debate among industry professionals and the public. While many developers and architects have welcomed the update, some fire safety experts and community members have expressed concerns about the potential risks associated with single egress designs. The provincial government has assured that the new regulations include stringent safety requirements to address these concerns, but the debate underscores the balance between innovation in building practices and maintaining public safety.